Amendments issued after the deadline for receipt of proposals must be provided to whom?

The correct answer to the question focuses on the procedural requirements for handling amendments issued after the deadline for receipt of proposals. The reasoning behind providing amendments to all offerors that have not been eliminated from competition is rooted in the principles of fairness and transparency in the procurement process.

When an amendment is issued after the deadline, it is essential to ensure that all potential bidders who are still in contention for the contract are informed of any changes that might affect the scope or terms of their proposals. This is to maintain a level playing field and allow these bidders to adjust their offers accordingly, promoting competitive and informed bidding.

By communicating the amendments to all offerors who have not been eliminated from competition, it ensures that the bidding process remains equitable and that all competitive proposals are evaluated on similar terms. This is particularly important in government contracting and other regulated environments where procedures are designed to prevent favoritism and promote a fair selection process.

The other options do not capture this balance of fairness and transparency. For instance, providing the amendments only to parties that submitted offers does not consider the status of those offers in the competition, and informing only the winning bidder would violate the principles of equitable treatment that are foundational to competitive procurement. Similarly, broadcasting the amendments to all without regard for submission status could