True or False: Each government contract should be priced separately and independently.

The statement is considered true because pricing each government contract separately and independently helps ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in the procurement process. Each contract typically involves unique requirements, risks, and costs, which means that combined pricing could obscure these distinct factors and lead to inefficiencies or inequities.

By treating each contract individually, contracting officers can more accurately account for the specific needs and stipulations of the project, leading to more precise bid evaluations and award decisions. This practice also aligns with regulations that often mandate a fair and reasonable price determination based on direct costs associated with each contract.

Moreover, independent pricing supports adherence to budgetary constraints and financial oversight, reducing the potential for conflicts of interest and ensuring that funds are allocated in a manner that best serves the government’s interests.

In contrast, the other options imply varying degrees of flexibility or lack of necessity in pricing. However, consistent separate pricing reinforces the integrity of the contracting process and ensures that each government's investment is justifiable and well-documented.